Ex-WHO General Director Warns About Wireless Technology

On Friday the 14th of August 2015, retired World Health Organization General-Director and Prime Minister of Norway, Dr. Gro Harlem Brundtland was interviewed by the Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten.

One of the issues raised in the interview was her current thoughts on wireless electromagnetic / radio frequency radiation. Her statement was very crystal clear, “Wireless Technology has Health Effects There is NO Doubt ” as she expanded on the topic.

Click below to view the interview:

 

Effects of EMF/RF Radiation to Red Blood Cells

At N8 State we consistently strive to conduct and offer new innovating research in the field of EMF/RF radiation to provide proof of damaging effects, and proof of protection from N8 State.

Here are a few subject samples from an Independent study showing the harmful effects of low-grade Electromagnetic Frequency / Radio Frequency radiation to red blood cells. Each test subject had blood drawn immediately after each test, and then immediately viewed and filmed under microscope. The tests were conducted one after the other with no resting periods other than drawing blood.

The first image is the subject’s natural or baseline blood drawn before using a cell phone.

The second image is the subject’s blood drawn after a 5 minute cell phone call showing red blood cells(RBC’s) to flatten and cluster into what is called a rouleaux formation, an impact almost synonymous with signs of sickness as red blood cells cannot carry enough oxygen.

The third image is the subject’s blood drawn after a 5 minute cell phone call using a cell phone protected. You will notice the blood drawn in the third image is similar and in some cases better than the natural blood drawn in the first image, bringing you back to your N8 state.

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. TV News on Wireless and Cell Phone EMF/RF Radiation

Want to Know Which US TV Networks Provided the Most News Coverage about Wireless EMF/RF Radiation Issues in the Past Year?

The winner is CBS. During the past year, CBS and its affiliates provided the most television news coverage about wireless electromagnetic frequency / radio frequency radiation and health reporting on safety issues related to cell phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, and smart meters. Besides CBS national news, almost all major CBS stations ran stories including stations in New York, Boston, Washington, DC; Pittsburgh, Atlanta, Miami, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.

CBS covered the year’s two major wireless policy developments: the International EMF Scientist Appeal and the Berkeley cell phone “Right to Know” ordinance.

With the recent publication of Norm Alster’s book,”Captured agency: How the Federal Communications Commission is dominated by the industries it presumably regulates,” it is time for CBS 60 Minutes to do an investigative story about why our government has not updated the obsolete wireless regulations adopted in 1996 that fail to protect the health of the American public.

News coverage on the other major networks paled in comparison. Leaving the question, are advertisers and the wireless industry influencing television news coverage of wireless EMF/RF Radiation safety issues?

Click the links below to get all the TV news stories:
CBS News

Mark Ackerman, CBS Denver, Jul 9, 2015

Are Wi-Fi Signals Making You Sick?

Marissa Bailey, CBS Chicago, July 1, 2015People Believe Wi-Fi Is Making Them Sick
Dr. Mallika Marshall, CBS Boston, Jun 8, 2015Seen At 11: Is Wi-Fi Making You Sick?
CBS New York, May 20, 2015Why I Declared Our Bedroom A Wireless-Free Zone
Julie Watts, CBS SF Bay Area, May 20, 2015Special Report: Upgrade Outage
WMMT (Kalamazoo, MI), May 19, 2015Berkeley Passes Nation’s First Radiation Warning For New Cellphones
CBS SF Bay Area, May 13, 2015
CBS News, May 13, 2015
Can you get radiation poisoning from your cellphone?
CBS News, May 12, 2015Woman Cuts Family Off From WiFi Over Health Concerns
Gerri Constant, CBS Los Angeles, May 5, 2015

CBS New York, Mar 6, 2015
Samantha Cortese, KESQ (Palm Desert, CA), Feb 18, 2015
KENS (San Antonio, TX), Nov 18, 2015
Cell phone towers raise new concerns about safety
Jason Barry, KPHO (Phoenix), Nov 10, 2015 (updated Nov. 25)FPL, Foes Of Smart Meters Square Off
CBS Miami, Sep 30, 2014
CBS Pittsburgh, Sep 15, 2014Brain Cancer Warning Stickers Proposed For Cellphones Sold In Berkeley
CBS SF Bay Area, Aug 22, 2014
Cristin Severance, KGTV (San Diego), Mar 19, 2015 (updated Mar 24, 2015)Ann Arbor family has power shut off by DTE in dispute over installing new SMART meter on their home
Dave LewAllen, WXYZ (Detroit, MI), Mar 18, 2015
WZZM (Lansing, MI), Dec 2, 2014
WFTV (Orlando, FL), Dec 2, 2014
KSAT (San Antonio), Sep 22, 2014 (updated Sep 23, 2014
3 Reasons Not to Sleep With Your Phone in the Bed
Camille Chatterjee, ABC News, Aug 5, 2014City pushes for cancer warning stickers on cell phones
WCVB (Boston), Jul 15, 2014Berkeley City Council proposes ordinance to get warning labels on cellphones
Tiffany Wilson, KGO (San Francisco), Jul 15, 2014

Fox News
Amber Lee, KTVU (Oakland), May 12, 2015Experts: Why wearable tech could pose health risks

Brooke Crothers, Fox News, Oct 20, 2014

Tamara Palmer, NBC Bay Area, Jun 8, 2015
CNN
No wireless radiation safety stories were found in a Google search and a search of CNN’s web site for the past year.

200+ International Scientist Submit EMF/RF Radiation Appeal To U.N. & W.H.O.

Scientists call for Protection from Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Field Exposure.

The appeal states, “We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF)”.

On June 8, 2015Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D. submitted the International EMF Scientist Appeal along with the Press Release and a description of the Appeal to the Federal Communications Commission in response to Proceeding Number 13-84. These three documents can be downloaded from FCC web site http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001060375. A summary of key documents submitted to the FCC under Proceeding Number 13-84 is available at http://bit.ly/FCCkeydocs.

Click the links to read more:

http://www.saferemr.com/2015/05/international-scientist-appeal-on.html

Read the Appeal:  http://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal

Cell Phone “Right to Know” Ordinance on EMF/RF Radiation

Berkeley, Ca, USA Adopts Cell Phone “Right to Know” Ordinance on Unanimous Vote.

Tuesday, May 12, 2015, the Berkeley City Council adopted the cell phone “Right to Know” ordinance on a unanimous vote of 9-0.  Berkeley is the first city in the nation to pass a cell phone Electromagnetic / Radio Frequency (EMF/RF) radiation ordinance since San Francisco disbanded its ordinance after a two-year court battle with the CTIA.

Harvard Law Professor Lawrence Lessig helped draft the ordinance and presented it to the Council on behalf of city staff. After the vote he discusses in full detail the drafting of the ordinance on his blog site, noting that no doubt many of the people fighting for the ordinance have a firm belief that non-ionizing radiation presents a significant and under appreciated health risk.

The only opposition to the ordinance came from the CTIA–The Wireless Association. The CTIA claims that consumers would be scared if they were directed to read the information that the FCC requires they provide to consumers.

Click below to read the full details with all the media links: 

http://www.saferemr.com/2014/11/berkeley-cell-phone-right-to-know.html

 

190 Scientists Petition U.N. and W.H.O. to Protect Humans and Wildlife

International Scientists Appeal to U.N. to Protect Humans and Wildlife from Electromagnetic / Radio Frequency Fields and Wireless Technology.

New York, NY, May 11, 2015. 190 scientists from 39 nations submitted an appeal to the United Nations, UN member states and the World Health Organization (WHO) requesting they adopt more protective exposure guidelines for electromagnetic fields (EMF) and wireless technology in the face of increasing evidence of risk. These exposures are a rapidly growing form of environmental pollution worldwide. The “International EMF Scientist Appeal” asks the Secretary General and UN affiliated bodies to encourage precautionary measures, to limit EMF exposures, and to educate the public about health risks, particularly to children and pregnant women.

Martin Blank, PhD of Columbia University representing 190 international scientists in the Appeal highlights the risks of electromagnetic fields emitted by telecommunications and utility technologies. Cautioning strongly, Dr. Blank says, “The time to deal with the harmful biological and health effects is long overdue. To protect our children, ourselves and our ecosystem, we must reduce exposure by establishing more protective guidelines.” Dr. Blank’s video is produced by ElectromagneticHealth.org on behalf of international scientists and the Appeal Committee.

Click the links below to read the full story and hear what 190 scientists have to say:

News: http://emfscientist.org/

Dr. Martin Blank 3min video: https://vimeo.com/123468632

Can Wearable Technology Hurt Your Vision?

Essilor is a world leading provider of eyeglass lenses, with their number one priority being you, the customer, and they have something to say about wearables.

We live in a world full of constantly changing and evolving technology.  One of the latest trends in tech is wearable technologies, such as Google Glass, smart watches or fitness trackers. In the past, most of these technologies were created for professional and industrial use, but these new types of devices are also being incorporated into daily life and used by general consumers.

With wearable devices like Google Glass, users have access to a mini computer emitting EMF/RF Radiation everywhere they go with a small screen integrated into the lens. This allows users to take pictures, watch videos, get directions and even browse the internet. While all of this makes life much more interactive, it can also lead to a few risks

Click below to read more on the risks:

http://news.essilorusa.com/stories/detail/wearable-technology-can-you-hurt-your-vision

American Academy Of Pediatrics Letter to FCC on EMF/RF Radiation

Are We Playing It Safe With Our Kids And Our Future???

Cindy Russell, MD is the VP for Community Health and chair of the Santa Clara County Medical Association Environmental Health Committee/SCCMA. Dr Russell writes about today’s increasing number of physicians, scientists, and parents that are concerned about long term health effects from WiFi and Cell Phones in schools. Her recent article highlights more of the concern and the physicians letter to the FCC for changes to be made immediately.

In a letter from the American Academy of Pediatrics to the FCC on August 29, 2013, “Current FCC standards do not account for the unique vulnerability and use patterns specific to pregnant women and children. It is essential that any new standard for cell phones or wireless devises be based on protecting the youngest and most vulnerable populations to ensure they are safeguarded throughout their lifetimes.”

Click below to read the full story:

http://issuu.com/18621/docs/bulletin_0415_web/17?e=8664035/12346964

NEW Microsoft N8 State App Released

The New N8 State Microsoft Desktop, Laptop, and Surface app is now available through the N8 State website.

Committed to protection of all and technological excellence, N8 State is proud to announce that we have completed our N8 technology testing and concluded the developed of our Microsoft Desktop and Laptop app for public use. The Microsoft app is currently only available for all Microsoft desktop computers, Microsoft running laptops, and all Microsoft Surface products. The Microsoft app is not intended for any Microsoft cell phones and will not work on a Microsoft cell phone. You can go to the N8State website to download the app through the PayPal/Credit Card payment system for $3.14. (per piece of protection Pi)

The Microsoft app will protect your body’s cells from Low-Grade Electromagnetic Frequency / Radio Frequency (EMF/RF) Radiation just like the Android app. Keeping in mind the main purpose of the app is to protect your cells from EMF/RF Radiation, the app will also have all the informational content such as News, Studies, Blog, etc, just like the original app to keep you informed. This app does however generate a bigger protection field, and the field can get larger depending on the size of your monitor or intensity of your WiFi. The app will have the “On” and “Off” features as well, so you can keep trying some of those muscle tests and really feel the power differences of the app when standing close to the computer screen while going back and forth with the On and Off button. In addition, keeping in mind that your cells are communicating coherently keeping their cellular properties and staying oxygenated instead of your cellular properties being deminished by EMF/RF Radiation, some test subjects have found that other medical ailments besides EHS seemed to lessen or go away while in front of the computer.

At N8 State we are committed to People, Process, and Protection. We strive to provide our protective technology to the growing demand of technological products used daily in society, with future hopes of protecting all users from the damages of the invisible EMF/RF Radiation threat.

No More EMF/RF Radiation Insurance From Lloyd’s of London

Lloyd’s of London Insurance is now excluding Electromagnetic Radiation injuries from their policies, and people are asking why, but Lloyd’s won’t discuss it.

Lloyd’s of London describes itself as “the world’s specialist insurance market,” and they’ve insured and paid on a variety of unusual risks and catastrophic claims. Unlike many other insurance brands, Lloyd’s is not a company; it’s “a market where our members join together as syndicates to insure risks.” What they insure falls into seven broad categories: casualty, property, marine, energy, motor, aviation and reinsurance.

Reinsurance is the key here, as, among other things, it serves “to protect an insurer against very large claims.” Just like tobacco, asbestos and climate change, and now microwave radiation apparently, even though regulatory and health agencies around the world refuse to accept RF exposure as causing illness. In Febuary of 2015, Lloyd’s of London excludes any compensation for claims: “Directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.” It is important that “radio waves” are explicitly included as they, specifically the microwave zone, are what enable wireless communications devices like cell phones, wi-fi, cordless phones etc.

After the policy holder made an inquiry seeking clarification about the exclusion language, CFC Underwriting LTD in London, the UK agent for Lloyd’s, sent the following: “The Electromagnetic Fields Exclusion (Exclusion 32) is a General Insurance Exclusion and is applied across the market as standard. The purpose of the exclusion is to exclude cover for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionising radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.”

Sharon Noble, Director of the Coalition to Stop Smart Meter Harm in British Columbia (Canada) brought the clause and CFC’s response to public attention. Her interpretation of this revealing statement is that CFC Underwriting, and perhaps all of “the market” is that the time has come to hedge against a future surge in “illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionising radiation exposure i.e. through mobile phone usage.” Why else would they refuse coverage “across the market as standard.”?

School officials who have been made aware of the health risks from Electromagnetic Radiation could be personally liable for exposing children and staff to microwave radiation in their schools. Please note that in a court of law, one cannot use any Regulatory body such as Health Canada as an excuse for ignoring warnings.

If you follow through Lloyd’s of London insurance waiver: Parents and teachers have a right to know that the Wi-Fi being installed in schools throughout the province (even those with wired internet access) emits microwave radiation that has the potential to do great harm.

“School Districts, School Boards and School Medical Health Officers should know that Lloyd’s of London has now excluded any liability coverage for injuries, “Directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.” (Exclusion 32) This would include the microwave radiation emitting from the Commercial Wi-Fi Transmitters and Wireless Devices in our schools. Lloyd’s of London is one of the largest insurers in the world and often leads the way in protection, taking on risks that no one else will. But now is seem that EMF/RF Radiation is to BIG of a health risk to cover even for the healthy and mighty insurance market.

Click below to read more on future of insurance:

https://www.lloyds.com/~/media/lloyds/reports/emerging%20risk%20reports/emf%20final%20november%202010.pdf

http://www.andrewgeller.me/blog/2015/03/25/lloyds-wont-discuss-emf-clause/

http://citizensforsafetechnology.org/insurance-and-liability-in-communities-governments,61,0

http://smartmeterharm.org/2015/03/18/lloyds-of-london-excludes-liability-coverage-for-rfemf-claims/